Connect with us

Technology

Spotify Now Lets You Search Songs by Songwriter

Published

on


Spotify has launched what it’s calling songwriter pages. These give songwriters a public profile on the streaming service, giving them a little bit of the spotlight. And Spotify users can use these songwriter pages to find songs by their favorite songwriters.

Unlock the FREE “Spotify Keyboard Shortcuts” cheat sheet now!

This will sign you up to our newsletter

Enter your Email

Your Favorite Artists Don’t Write Their Own Songs

You may be surprised to learn that your favorite artists probably don’t write their own songs. This is especially true of popstars, who usually employ teams of songwriters to write hits for them. And these songwriters rarely get the recognition they deserve.

However, things are slowly changing, and streaming music services are part of that change. Spotify has been publicly displaying song credits since 2018. And now, Spotify has launched songwriter pages which gives songwriters their own public profiles.

Spotify Launches Public Profiles for Songwriters

Spotify announced songwriter pages in a post on Spotify for Artists. It’s being launched in beta, with a limited number of high-profile songwriters involved from the beginning. These include Meghan Trainor, Fraser T. Smith, Teddy Geiger, and Justin Tranter.

These initial profiles have been created in collaboration between Spotify, the songwriters in question, and music publishers. However, Spotify is openly inviting other songwriters to express an interest in gaining a public profile on the streaming service.

Songwriter pages make it easier for you to get to know particular songwriters and discover what songs they have written. All you need to do is click the three dots next to a track, and select Song Credits. You can then click on the name of one of the songwriters.

You’ll see all of the songs they have written and the artists they’ve collaborated with. You can also click the Listen on Spotify button to open a playlist full of the songs they’ve written or co-written. Potentially allowing you to discover new music.

Timeless Ways to Discover New Music to Stream

Spotify’s songwriter pages are still only in beta, so they’re not yet perfect. However, this is a good first attempt to give songwriters the credit they deserve. And, as a bonus, they also give Spotify users another great way to discover new music to stream.

Read the full article: Spotify Now Lets You Search Songs by Songwriter



Source link

قالب وردپرس

Technology

America might survive coronavirus. But will the election?

Published

on


Most Americans are under orders to stay at home, but Jeff Ellington is preparing for the busiest year he’s ever had. Runbeck Election Services in Arizona, which produces vote-by-mail ballots, has stocked its 90,000-square-foot (8,300-square-meter) facility in Phoenix with 200,000 half-ton rolls of paper—and there’s much more on order.

Ellington, Runbeck’s chief operating officer, is preparing for an election unlike any the United States has seen before. He says the company usually works with 21 states to produce and mail ballots so that people can vote from home. Today, staff are fielding calls from almost every state in the country, taking phone meetings and video chats anywhere they can safely self-isolate, whether that’s in their kitchens, their yards, or their cars. But in the next few weeks they’re going to have to get back to work. 

The machinery of electoral politics has been thrown into turmoil by covid-19. While primaries have already been held in some states, others have been delayed or transformed. All the typical activities of a campaign—canvassing for votes, trying to drive the political conversation, grabbing the public’s attention—seem impossible in a time of strange and deadly crisis. Right now, we don’t even know if it will be safe to vote at polling places when November rolls around. The only thing that does seem to be clear is that 2020’s election is going to be a challenge of unprecedented proportions.

Unsafe options

The biggest problem—and the one occupying Ellington and his staff, as well as politicians, campaign managers, and many voters—is also the most obvious one: How will voting actually happen?

There are three possible solutions. The first is to continue traditional in-person voting at a polling station on Election Day. 

Crowded polling places have, for better or worse, become emblematic of American democracy. But if the virus’s spread continues into the fall—and infectious-disease modelers say it very likely will—then these gatherings could be willfully dangerous to public health, and not just that of the voters themselves. Reports from Florida to California, where primary voting went ahead despite the growing pandemic, show election officials and poll workers—who are generally older and more vulnerable—falling sick.

“I was sadly on a call yesterday with election officials in California,” says Tammy Patrick, an elections expert at the Democracy Fund. “One of them has the coronavirus, and they know for a fact that they contracted it during the primary season. So it literally is a question of life and death. Conducting an entirely in-person election would put voters at risk, poll workers at risk, election officials, and candidates too.”

“Conducting an entirely
in-person election would put voters at risk, poll workers at risk, election officials, and candidates too”

Tammy Patrick, Democracy Fund

A second option is to spread in-person voting out over days or weeks to reduce crowding. This is not impossible—39 states and Washington, DC, already allow early voting—but it is still a health risk.

The third and safest answer, most experts agree, is voting by mail. It’s a tried and trusted system already embraced by 20% of US voters. But on such short notice, making it happen everywhere is a lot more complex than it sounds. 

Some states, like Oregon and Colorado, already do almost all their voting this way. Arizona, California, Hawaii, Montana, Utah, and Washington are majority vote-by-mail, with support from all sides. Some are trying to make the switch: Georgia and Michigan have announced that they will be sending absentee ballots to every single voter. But others, such as Louisiana and West Virginia, make postal voting especially difficult.

In any case, even state governments don’t have full control of what happens during the vote. Instead of one election authority, or even 50, there are more than 5,000 separate local jurisdictions that run the country’s elections. Preparing them all for rapid change will be overwhelming. But there isn’t really an alternative.

“We have to determine how we are going to make sure that our democracy continues to function,” says Amber McReynolds, a former Colorado election official and now the head of the National Vote at Home Institute. “This is an emergency. Vote-by-mail is one of the only solutions we have right now to make sure all Americans can vote effectively, safely, and securely.”

Going postal

If the decision to switch to vote-by-mail is made, a second problem arises: the gargantuan task of getting tens of millions of extra voting papers into people’s hands. Ellington says Runbeck, one of just a handful of national election services companies, has the capacity and materials to produce just over 4 million extra ballots, and there are around 250 million eligible voters in America. Following government recommendations, 95% of Runbeck’s staff were working from home in March, but the company is now in the process of bringing many of them back on site to deal with what’s about to happen. 

The work is complicated. While mail-in voting slips may look much like ordinary mass mailings, they are also individualized and differ widely from county to county and state to state. Envelopes have to be custom printed with the correct addresses, county logos, tracking data, and information that gets ballots back to their local counties for tabulation. Proofreading, gathering resources, educating voters, and dealing with counting processes, new election laws, complex hardware needs, and sluggish bureaucracy are just a few of the hurdles officials face.

And on a raw, physical level, the sheer quantity of paper required to produce these precisely printed ballots and envelopes is mind-boggling. The 100,000 tons of paper already at Runbeck’s facility is not exactly what you’ll find at your local Staples or OfficeMax.

“Our rolls are about 1,000 pounds [450 kilograms],” Ellington explains. “We run it through a printing press, and out the other end come about 20,000 ballots every hour. We have the capacity of producing a little over 1 million ballots per day out of our facility.”

Right now, American companies like International Paper face a rapidly changing environment because of the virus. On the one hand, work they thought they’d be doing has fallen through as the country shuts down; on the other, there will be an influx of orders as states and counties decide to make the switch. When exactly Runbeck gets its bumper order for more paper depends on where it fits on the priority list, says Ellington.

And, critically, there are strict time limits, Ellington explains. “In the situation we’re in now, decisions need to be made in April because of the volume we’re talking about,” he says. “The equipment is not simple. The staffing and training are extensive. If we have a massive push to vote-by-mail, the planning has to start now, and people need to start thinking differently.”
And then there’s the problem that voting by mail, even if experts recognize it as the best, safest option in a pandemic, is deeply unpopular in some quarters.

Republican rejections

In March, as the number of coronavirus cases in the US started to spike, President Donald Trump took to his favorite TV haunts to fight against the idea of mail voting. In an interview with Fox & Friends, he criticized Democrats as they pushed to include vote-by-mail support in the $2 trillion stimulus bill. 

“The things they had in there were crazy,” Trump said. “They had levels of voting that if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

No matter that the president and first lady had recently registered to cast their own absentee ballots from their new home state of Florida; Republicans have repeatedly opposed expansion of voting rights for absentee and mail-in ballots, claiming that it increases fraud.

That doesn’t reflect reality, however. Oregon has seen over 100 million mail-in ballots since switching to vote-by-mail in 1998, and no one has ever found significant numbers of fraudulent votes. In 2016, out of over 2 million voters, only 10 Oregonians were convicted of vote fraud. (In fact, mail votes incorporate a number of security measures, including bar-code tracking of ballots and accurate voter registration databases. Most of the time, signatures are used to verify identity.)

However, Trump has built part of his political success on lying about mass voter fraud, and the Republican Party has mounted efforts to make voting harder, not easier, such as purging voter rolls and adding further identity requirements. Vote-by-mail is a victim of that partisan attack, even if evidence shows it can increase turnout across the board.

In the end, the stimulus bill passed in March did include $400 million to help states with their election problems. It’s a big number, but less than a quarter of the amount voting experts say is needed to run this election safely during the pandemic. “I think it shows a really lamentable lack of properly prioritizing the importance of elections that are the bedrock of our democracy,” says Eddie Perez of the Open Source Election Technology Institute.

Still, things could change. When Congress returns later in April, a more robust vote-by-mail bill championed by Democratic senators Ron Wyden and Amy Klobuchar is expected to become a priority. It would give even more cash—the exact amount is still being decided—to those who actually run elections, designating it to speed up the difficult transition to vote-by-mail.

The bill, known as the Natural Disaster and Emergency Ballot Act, would also ensure that people who cannot vote by mail have more time to vote in person by requiring at least 20 days of early voting to prevent long lines and crowds. It would give states money to hire and train new poll workers to avoid endangering the older folks who usually fill that role.

Wyden and Klobuchar may or may not secure the funding they want or the votes in Congress they require. But more money is definitely required to manage the shift properly. McReynolds’s National Vote at Home Institute tallied up the cost in Michigan, including the price of facilities, infrastructure, ballot mailing, voter education, professional services, and employee salaries. Final bill: $37.5 million for that single state, and only if they start the work today.

Ground game gone

Even if the voting process is expanded, authorities act quickly, and they get all the funds they need, there’s a whole other universe of issues to solve. For example, if so much of the country is under shelter-in-place orders, how will the campaign be fought?

Already we’re seeing election season shift as the crisis changes the way we interact and communicate. Rallies have moved from arenas to live streams. For the Democratic presidential primary debates, TV studio audiences were told to stay home. And fundraising has plummeted as markets have gone through some of the steepest drops and most dizzying ascents in US history. When millions of Americans file for unemployment simultaneously, no one is thinking much about donating to their favorite candidates.

Jaime Lennon, a spokesperson for Dutch Ruppersberger, a congressman from Maryland, says business as usual is not an option. “He’s so busy right now,” she says.

“We are hitting near records in terms of phone calls and emails from constituents that need help, whether it be unemployment, or small-business owners needing help navigating the new aid package, or just folks with medical questions, like questions about the availability of testing … It seems like all election operations are on pause at the moment.”

“We are hitting near records in terms of phone calls and emails from constituents that need help… It seems like all election operations are on pause at the moment.”

Jaime Lennon, Congressional aide

Even if there were time to campaign, what would that look like when supporters can’t go knocking on doors to drum up votes and the economic crisis is draining the bank accounts of grassroots donors?

“There is no sunny spin if you are running against an incumbent. It’s devastating,” says Brianna Wu, a software engineer and candidate for Congress in Massachusetts. Unable to knock on doors, Wu may struggle even to get the signatures needed to end up on the ballot, a task her campaign was previously well ahead on.

There are plenty of ways to target voters without ever having to meet anyone in person, like phone banking, television ads, and social media. But Wu, who ran and lost in 2018, says it’s not enough.

“We’ve certainly been fortunate in having a very strong digital game, but one of the lessons I learned in the 2018 race is you cannot win an election by just hanging out online,” she says. “I got about half the votes I needed to win by focusing on digital. And that was great for a first-time candidate, but my hardest lesson is you cannot win without a strong field operation. And I find myself asking, how the hell are we going to do that?” 

Many candidates—including Wu—had been focused on building the kind of ground game that famously catapulted Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to victory in New York City: knock on doors, talk with people, win votes. Now Wu’s campaign is calling up individual houses and asking to send over petitions, pens, and envelopes to get signatures and move their fight forward. Meanwhile, conversations about fundraising are next to impossible.

“My theory is this crisis will benefit the status quo,” Wu says. “It will come down to name recognition if people vote at all.”

The fog of online war

The social-media platforms that were exploited as conduits for disinformation in the 2016 election will have more impact than ever in the 2020 campaign: there simply is no better way to reach voters under lockdown. Though the platforms now have new rules and algorithms to limit disinformation, a rapid shift to making the campaigns even more digital creates new opportunities for misleading voters.

China, where the pandemic began, first tried to cover up the disease: now it has armies of propagandists spreading conspiracy theories about covid-19’s origins. European Union officials, meanwhile, say Russia is undertaking a “significant disinformation campaign” against Western Europe, intent on sowing chaos and uncertainty during a crisis.

The biggest disinformation threat the US faces, however, may be domestic. In 2016, Trump tried to undermine trust in election results by saying that if he didn’t win, it would be because the system was rigged. And during the coronavirus crisis, while his rivals for the presidency have been muted, he has used his daily press briefings to repeatedly downplay the severity of the pandemic, rewrite the historical record about his response to the situation, and distort or lie about things like the effectiveness of drugs and the availability of ventilators. 

“You want a leader to give people hope, but you need a leader to be honest,” says Angus King, a senator from Maine who cochaired the Cyberspace Solarium Commission, a project meant to define the US’s national strategy online. “What did Churchill say at the beginning of World War II? ‘I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears, and sweat.’ He told the British it was going to be hard, with no sugarcoating. President Trump said it’ll be like a miracle and it will just go away, and that this malaria drug is a gift from God. Turns out it isn’t. That’s harmful.” 

No stopping

In the fall of 2018, one of the strongest storms ever recorded in the western Pacific Ocean slammed into the Northern Mariana Islands, a commonwealth of the US. The storm had intensified over the span of three days into a category 5 super-typhoon, with winds reaching 175 miles (280 kilometers) per hour. Typhoon Yutu made landfall on October 24, killing dozens of people, destroying hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of buildings, and disrupting life in ways no one there had ever seen before.

The Northern Mariana Islands pushed Election Day back a week in order to begin recovering from the storm first. Remarkably, this had never happened before in US history: elections have taken place on schedule through not just the influenza pandemic of 1918 but two world wars and even the Civil War.

That means the likelihood of the national election being pushed back or even canceled is virtually nil. Election experts and constitutional lawyers widely agree that such a change would require a constitutional amendment, and little about the current political climate suggests that Congress could pass one.

A bigger concern is that without the option to vote by mail, the pandemic will discourage people from voting altogether. The 1918 flu outbreak may have been responsible for low turnout in that year’s midterm election (though turnout fell for the next two midterms as well). More recently, France held its nationwide municipal elections on March 15—just one day after a national lockdown was announced in response to the coronavirus. Turnout was low, and the next round of elections was pushed back by three months as a result. Low turnout in November will inevitably invite claims that the results lack legitimacy. 

“Generally speaking, it’s not a good idea to roll out major changes in election rules in the midst of a major election,” says Richard Hasen, a political science professor at the University of California, Irvine, and author of a recent book on threats to American democracy. “But we’re facing an unprecedented health emergency. And so we’re not going to have a perfect election. The question is how we can make it as good as possible and disenfranchise as few people as possible.”

The answer—for voters and for democratic institutions alike—is clear: if America wants to hold an election that produces a “normal” result without sacrificing people’s health, it has a blueprint to work from. It needs to start now, even if the solution isn’t perfect. And it’s going to require one hell of a lot of paper.



Source link

قالب وردپرس

Continue Reading

Technology

Microsoft’s dual-screen Surface Neo laptop isn’t coming this year

Published

on



  • Microsoft’s dual-screen Surface Neo laptop is not going to launch in 2020, a new report says.
  • Instead, Microsoft will focus on delivering Windows 10X on single-screen devices even though the operating system is supposed to power dual-screen laptops.
  • Windows 10X won’t be available for any other dual-screen Neo alternatives from other Windows device makers this year.
  • Visit BGR’s homepage for more stories.

The novel coronavirus has already ruined a bunch of product launches in the tech world, as several events had to be canceled in the past few months. We’ll see other product delays in the coming months as well, as it’ll be a while until life returns to normal. Save for a vaccine, we’ll have to worry about COVID-19 reemerging through 2022, so the old “normal” isn’t coming back anytime soon. Recent reports said the iPhone 12 series could be pushed back as far as December because of the pandemic. The Xbox Series X isn’t delayed, according to a recent interview, but things are still in flux, and launch plans might change depending on the progress of COVID-19 management. But it looks like the coronavirus has made at least one victim when it comes to 2020 products, and that’s Microsoft’s dual-screen Windows 10X-running Neo laptop.

Announced last fall after a few months of rumors, the Neo is supposed to offer Windows users a novel form factor. The device looks just like a compact laptop, but there’s no built-in physical keyboard — although one can be laid on top of the bottom screen. Instead, we have two displays for the tablet-like device. The Neo can be used with a stand or by itself and will have several modes available, including a book model and a regular notebook mode. Running everything is a special version of Windows 10 called Windows 10X, which is an operating system customized for dual-screen devices.

If any of that sounds exciting, then you’ll have to wait until 2021 to get it. Or even later. It’s unclear at this point when the Neo will launch, but ZDNet heard from sources familiar with Microsoft’s plans the Neo has been paused. Not only that, but Microsoft isn’t even going to make Windows 10X available to other laptop makers interested in launching their own dual-screen laptops this year:

While the official line is that Windows 10X targets dual-screen devices, Microsoft is apparently looking to get it working on single-screen laptops. However, the operating system isn’t ready for prime time:

In February this year, Microsoft showed off publicly how containerized apps would work on Windows 10X. Officials didn’t discuss how well/badly Win32 apps worked when virtualized on 10X, but the inside word was the team had a long way to go to make this something “normal” users would understand and accept, as compatibility levels were not great.

Microsoft could still have some Windows 10X features ready this year, the report notes, like having Windows apps run virtually in containers. If that’s the case, these features could be packed into Windows 10 as well.

The report also notes that the smaller version of the Surface Neo, the Duo, is still on track for a 2020 launch. Surface Duo, however, is an Android dual-screen phone.



Source link

قالب وردپرس

Continue Reading

Technology

Why the 5G coronavirus conspiracy theory is physically impossible

Published

on


There is no evidence that 5G has anything to do with the coronavirus (Metro.co.uk)

We don’t want to go over this again, but it appears that large swathes of the internet – including some celebrities – are still spreading a conspiracy theory about 5G technology and how it’s spreading Covid-19.

It’s wrong and misleading and we’ve already written about it here and here. But, according to Ofcom, half of UK adults have been exposed to false or misleading information about the coronavirus in the last week.

So, we’re going to go over this 5G thing again.

One myth goes that 5G radio waves suppress the human immune system therefore making it easier to catch coronavirus as it continues to spread around the world. And, as such, idiots have been attacking telephone masts just at the time the world’s population needs its communications infrastructure intact and working.

If you’re not quite sure what 5G is, it’s data transferred over a radio spectrum separated into ‘bands’ which relates to the frequency of the radio waves. It is taking over from 4G and offers faster and more stable communications for devices (phones, laptops and industrial equipment) that’s capable of receiving the signal.

It has no effect on the human body. Your microwave emits a more powerful wavelength than the nearby 5G mast.

Don’t just take it from me, either. Dr Gero Baiarda is one of the hundreds of GPs currently on-call at GPDQ – the UK’s leading GP-on-demand service. And he also thinks the 5G conspiracy theory is ridiculous.

Read the latest updates: Coronavirus news live

‘5G radio waves carry too little energy to cause harm. There have been many research studies that demonstrate this beyond all doubt,’ he told Metro.co.uk.

‘5G occupies the same wavelengths as those previously used by analogue TV. The reason that you can no longer access the analogue television signal is because it was phased out to make way for new 5G mobile phone technology.

‘Therefore, claiming that 5G waves will weaken your immune system to the point that you are defenceless against Covid-19 is like saying that the old-fashioned TV signals caused pandemics. We lived with them for more than 70 years, and they clearly did not.’

Dr Gero Baiarda is an NHS GP who knows what he's talking about (GPDQ)

Dr Gero Baiarda is an NHS GP who knows what he’s talking about (GPDQ)

Amazingly, the idea that 5G can weaken our immune system isn’t the only myth doing the rounds at the moment. Some people – I can’t imagine who (but probably those without the capacity for abstract thought) believe the coronavirus can actually be transported by 5G signals into our bodies and infect us.

Hey, I’m not saying these theories are smart, I’m just saying they exist.

‘To enter the human body, the virus needs to be absorbed by receptors in the mucous membranes predominantly found in our eyes, noses and mouths,’ explains Dr. Baiarda.

‘Therefore, for the 5G theory to be true, the virus would have to somehow hitch a ride on these very specific low frequency wavelengths, which is impossible, before making their way like guided missiles into your eyes, nose or mouth.

‘Social distancing is so effective because the virus has no way of moving on its own. It is not propelled much beyond 2 metres even by coughing and sneezing. It is, however, transferred very effectively from one person to another. This has been its primary mode of transmission.’

Ofcom and the government are currently talking to the social media companies to try and get them to work harder to suppress the spread of false information.

The regulator has published research about people who have been exposed to falsehoods about the virus and it says that two thirds (66%) are seeing it every day.

Ofcom’s research shows:

  • Most people (55%) are ignoring false claims about coronavirus. Fifteen per cent are using fact-checking tips from the media while a similar proportion (13%) are double-checking with friends and family. One in 14 people are forwarding on false or misleading information about the virus.
  • Many people (40%) are finding it hard to know what is true or false about the virus. This rises to more than half (52%) of 18-24 year-olds.
  • Younger people are following official advice less closely. Virtually all people who took part in the survey said they are closely following the official advice to practice social distancing (98%); only go outside for essential reasons (97%); and wash their hands regularly (96%). However, only 65% of people said they were following handwashing advice very closely, and this falls to 43% among 18-24s.

Cellular phone antennas on the top of the telecommunication GSM 5G tower .Future communication system

Leave the masts alone – they’re vital to our ability to get through this (Getty Images/iStockphoto)

This pandemic will leave a huge trail of debris in its wake, one of which will be the way information filters through our social networks – whether private or public.

Recently, the likes of Facebook, Google, Reddit, Microsoft and Twitter (among others) issued a statement saying they are ‘jointly combating fraud and misinformation about the virus’

‘We are working closely together on COVID-19 response efforts. We’re helping millions of people stay connected while also jointly combating fraud and misinformation about the virus, elevating authoritative content on our platforms, and sharing crucial updates in coordination with government healthcare agencies around the world,’ the statement read.

Whether what they’re doing is enough or not is a matter of debate. What’s not up for discussion is the fact that everyone – tech companies, media companies, celebrities, politicians and scientists, need to make sure the information they disseminate is as accurate and up-to-date as possible.

So, please trust me on this: there is no link between 5G technology and the spread of coronavirus.

Do you have a story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk 

Share your views in the comments below

MORE: Fifteen pensioners dead after coronavirus sweeps through care home

MORE: Coronavirus and 5G: The new YouTube ban explained

MORE: NHS is facing its worst weekend on record with tsunami of coronavirus patients



Coronavirus latest news and updates



Source link

قالب وردپرس

Continue Reading

Trending